The culture of newer countries, discovered and founded in modern times is to celebrate a national day, often on the day history records the country was founded.
This has worked well for two hundred plus years as the founders celebrated the beginning and growth of their land.
These celebrations ignored the fact that these lands had already been discovered by the indigenous people many thousands of years earlier. The celebrations have given a tacit approval to the countries forefathers for slaughtering the indigenous for the fiscal benefit of the invaders.
More and more as these societies mature and begin to learn equality, the actions of the forefathers need to be questioned. The question to be asked is whether it was right for the country to continue to celebrate the arrival of an invasionary force who slaughtered the occupants already there and who set up a culture of accepting the continued degrading and killing off of these people.
A real leader would stop this behaviour immediately as they set out to steer the country on a course to maturity and equality. A pretend leader would find a way to justify the celebration.
Such countries need a national day, but it is a national indigenous day, where they are acknowledged publicly, where crowds gather to watch them march in the streets and enjoy watching and learning their culture. Is there a real leader in the world today who will do his?
From my guide Crazy Horse through Ian Rogers Director Sphinx Spiritual
Monday 27 November 2017
Monday 20 November 2017
Crazy Horse on antagonising acts of war
If you prod a snake for long enough it will strike at you. Having stricken at you, you cannot blame the snake for you caused its action.
Why is the leader of the USA continually prodding the leader of North Korea. Is there a need to cause world terror by causing them to strike. The personal power or posturing of a leader is unimportant as compared to the needs of the inhabitants of earth.
Why does the leader of Australia choose to prod the leader of North Korea in support of the leader of the USA like a young boy threatening what his big brother can do.
World peace will not come from antagonising acts of war.
The leader of North Korea was widely condemned when it was he who was threatening and prodding.
That condemnation now belongs to the leader of the USA and the leaders of any of their minor ally nations who do likewise.
From my guide Crazy Horse through Ian Rogers Director Sphinx Spiritual
Monday 13 November 2017
Crazy Horse on split loyalties
It has long been believed that split loyalties are something to be avoided. In my time on earth a split loyalty was an Indian scouting for white man's army. It was frowned upon and such an Indian was no longer accepted by either the Indian or the white man.
Today the issue of split loyalties arises in different countries with dual citizenship rights, with people living in one country returning to their original country to take up arms in support of that country. As this becomes more prevalent, the more society accepts it.
In Australia politicians are being forced to leave office due to a right of dual citizenship bestowed upon them through the actions of their parents migrating to Australia at an earlier time.
Typically the politicians are looking at the issue from the perspective of political short term gain, either to retain or gain office.
Sadly, politicians are not elected for their world view or for the long term growth of mankind.
It is today, as it was in my time, situations are arising that call for a deeper understanding of borders. Inevitably the world is heading to be more of a one world and restrictions stopping politicians representing their constituents because of the heritage of their parents are silly and need to be removed so as to help facilitate the move towards one world.
In Australia the laws will be changed as it affects politicians.
Isn't it amazing that they will change the laws concerning themselves as part of a march towards being one world, yet on the other hand, proudly make it illegal for refugees to enter their land.
People do not have to respect hypocritical politicians, but they have a duty to not accept them.
From my guide Crazy Horse through Ian Rogers Director Sphinx Spiritual
Today the issue of split loyalties arises in different countries with dual citizenship rights, with people living in one country returning to their original country to take up arms in support of that country. As this becomes more prevalent, the more society accepts it.
In Australia politicians are being forced to leave office due to a right of dual citizenship bestowed upon them through the actions of their parents migrating to Australia at an earlier time.
Typically the politicians are looking at the issue from the perspective of political short term gain, either to retain or gain office.
Sadly, politicians are not elected for their world view or for the long term growth of mankind.
It is today, as it was in my time, situations are arising that call for a deeper understanding of borders. Inevitably the world is heading to be more of a one world and restrictions stopping politicians representing their constituents because of the heritage of their parents are silly and need to be removed so as to help facilitate the move towards one world.
In Australia the laws will be changed as it affects politicians.
Isn't it amazing that they will change the laws concerning themselves as part of a march towards being one world, yet on the other hand, proudly make it illegal for refugees to enter their land.
People do not have to respect hypocritical politicians, but they have a duty to not accept them.
From my guide Crazy Horse through Ian Rogers Director Sphinx Spiritual
Tuesday 7 November 2017
Crazy Horse on rule makers breaking the law
People to whom society has given the power to create, change or repeal laws, hold a special position of trust. A higher standard of behaviour in respect of those laws is expected than from the remainder of society.
Where a law is inappropriate, they have the special position of being able to repeal it or change it. Where they do nothing about a law they are seen to be giving it their consent.
Where such a law begins to affect their political future, they are duty bound to abide by the law in its strictest interpretation. Attempts to ignore the law, pretend it does not apply to them or to argue fine points so as to not have it apply, casts such law makers into disrepute and unworthy of holding power to make laws.
Law makers who expect laws to apply to all but themselves have lost the right to be lawmakers.
From my guide Crazy Horse through Ian Rogers Director Sphinx Spiritual
Where a law is inappropriate, they have the special position of being able to repeal it or change it. Where they do nothing about a law they are seen to be giving it their consent.
Where such a law begins to affect their political future, they are duty bound to abide by the law in its strictest interpretation. Attempts to ignore the law, pretend it does not apply to them or to argue fine points so as to not have it apply, casts such law makers into disrepute and unworthy of holding power to make laws.
Law makers who expect laws to apply to all but themselves have lost the right to be lawmakers.
From my guide Crazy Horse through Ian Rogers Director Sphinx Spiritual
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)