When it is shown that a leader of a country has accumulated wealth prior to being elected to office in a way that has subverted the laws of the country, there is a moral outcry by their detractors and a feigned indifference by their supporters.
What does it mean? It means that upon such a disclosure, the acts of the country leader leading up to the disclosure and subsequently, need to be viewed in the light of the morality of the leader.
Where the morality of a leader is substantially diminished, their standing as a leader diminishes in the same proportion.
Country leaders pay homage to their morality when it suits them, however it needs to be more than attending their church, it needs to reflect in their actions.
If a country accepts an immoral leader, they are setting the standard for behaviour throughout the entire country. No longer can they hold up drug dealers and fraudsters as the demons of society. Such behaviour becomes tacitly accepted under an immoral regime.
If a country wants to raise the standard of behaviour of its citizens, it must first raise the standard of its leader.
From my guide Crazy Horse through Ian Rogers, Director Sphinx Spiritual
No comments:
Post a Comment