It is fascinating to understand the rules of war on earth, when and how it is acceptable to kill other humans.
It is as if man believes that killing in 'acceptable' ways is more acceptable to a higher force than killing in unacceptable ways.
The human mind has a particular ability to contort itself to come up with arguments to justify the unjustifiable.
There are countries who kill their own citizens for committing crimes against their society by shooting them, hanging them, electrifying them and injecting them with chemicals.
The sick are regularly killed by chemicals and it it either legal or so common it is acceptable.
Therefore, where does the moral justification come from when a country who kills their own with chemicals, decries the actions of another country for killing in a state of war through chemicals.
Why does the world sit back and accept retribution against another country for killing with chemicals, by bombing them and killing with explosives.
When will it be seen that the mental sleight of hand of taking moral superiority because one way of killing is better than the next, thus making one country more civilised than the next; is nothing more than a fraud upon society.
If the leaders of countries have a desire to appease a higher authority, then they would stop killing, not justify their killing method and decry the killing method of another.
From my guide Crazy Horse through Ian Rogers Director Sphinx Spiritual
No comments:
Post a Comment